Legal Opinion

National City Bank v. Parr

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1933No. 26,342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanoe, J.

This action was commenced by appellant against appellee, Modessa Bates Parr, on a promissory note executed by her, payable to her sister and co-appellee, Geneva Bates Myers, by whom it was indorsed to appellant. To the complaint Parr answered by general denial and by cross-complaint against appellant bank and her sister, appellee Myers, alleging that the bank represented to her that her sister was indebted to it on account of several promissory notes, that appellant bank and the Commercial National Bank were about to consolidate and later did enter info a consolidation and that appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. Valley Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Dufour v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madigan v. LumbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
  2. Community State Bank v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Community State Bank v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API