Legal Opinion
Seth v. Lew Hing
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1932No. Docket No. 7942PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Plaintiffs sued as joint liquidators of the Oriental Commercial Bank, Ltd., of Hongkong, China, upon a joint and several promissory note of defendants in the sum of $99,534.96. The cause was tried with a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiffs upon the note with accrued interest in the sum of approximately $127,000. The trial court granted defendants' motion for a new trial, and from that order the plaintiffs have appealed upon typewritten transcripts.
The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Christ v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Union Bank v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Anderson v. MichelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Cole v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.