Legal Opinion

Work v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso Robles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1929No. Docket No. 3914PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, J., pro tem.

The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs who sued for a balance on the purchase price of real property. Negotiations were carried on in behalf of the parties to this appeal, which culminated in an option agreement, the portion which is essential to a determination of this appeal being as follows:

“Whereas, the sellers are owners of certain lands in San Luis Obispo and Monterey counties, California, containing approximately six thousand (6000) acres, more particularly described in parcels as follows:
“Parcel No. 1. All that portion of said tract of, 6000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lick v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Duncan v. F. A. Hihn Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Work v. County National Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Clay v. RossiIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hato Rey Electroplating, Inc. v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API