Legal Opinion

Clay v. Rossi

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1940No. 6842PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, C. J.

Appellant, P. J. Clay, a resident of Los Angeles, California, and agent of the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Herman J. Rossi of Wallace, Idaho, general agent of the Aetna Life Insurance Co., and Bell and Malcom, members of the contracting firm of Orino, Bell and Malcom, met at the Multnomah Hotel, Portland, Oregon, Sept. 17, 1934, for the purpose of executing the necessary contracts and surety bonds required by the United States government on “Railroad relocation on Contract No. 21, for the Bonneville Dam.” Clay and Rossi had never met before and upon introduction Rossi presented his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Work v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Sanders v. Standard Wheel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Lovekin v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Hubbard v. BallIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dowd v. Estate of DowdIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Henry C. Beck CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fairchild v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Yin v. Amino Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Eisenbeck v. ButtgenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Lenchitsky v. H. J. Sandberg Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API