Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff sought to recover the alleged balance due under contracts for the sale of three carloads of lumber. Defendants pleaded an accord and satisfaction as an affirmative defense. The trial court made findings rejecting said defense and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1,011.96. From such judgment, defendants appeal.
Defendants argue the single proposition that the findings against the existence of an accord and satisfaction are contrary to the undisputed facts. An examination of the record sustains defendants ’ position.
Plaintiff, a lumber broker in Oregon, contracted…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Villa v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stambaugh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Acadia, California, Ltd. v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.