Legal Opinion

Duncan v. F. A. Hihn Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1915No. Civ. No. 1506PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County and from an order denying a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action brought to recover the sum of $1327.56, with legal interest from January 12, 1911, and costs, the plaintiff contending that the amount is due from the defendant as the assignor of the California Pine Box and Lumber Co., a corporation. The court gave judg ment in favor of the defendant, and denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, from which judgment and order this appeal is taken.

Plaintiff’s claim is founded upon a written contract entered into between said California Pine Box and Lumber Co. and defendant by correspondence. The Box Company was engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Creighton v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Abbey v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Chester v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Work v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Owens v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. Gran v. BratsbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API