Legal Opinion
Work v. County National Bank & Trust Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1935No. L. A. 13679PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant trust company appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $25,589.38, plus interest. The action is based on the theory that appellant violated the terms of a trust, to respondents’ damage in the above amount.
In 1919 respondents granted to one McRae an option on certain lands then owned by respondents in Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties. McRae immediately assigned this option to the Associated Almond Growers of Paso Robles, hereafter referred to as the Association. Subsequently, the lands mentioned in the option were conveyed by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Work v. Associated Almond Growers of Paso RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Clapp v. VatcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Kinley v. ThelenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Pierce v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.