Legal Opinion
Lincoln v. Didak
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1958No. Civ. 22792PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff, who is also known as John G-. Oppenheimer, appeals from orders dismissing his complaint against various named defendants, being the City Attorney of the City of Los Angeles, three of his deputies, the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles, a member of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and the Clerk of the Municipal Court of Los Angeles Judicial District.
The complaint which was directed not only against the defendants above named, who are respondents upon this appeal, but many others including judges of the Municipal Court of the Los Angeles…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Pianka v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Vallindras v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Crowley v. Modern Faucet Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Collins v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Adohr Milk Farms, Inc. v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.