Legal Opinion

Adohr Milk Farms, Inc. v. Love

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1967No. Civ. 24201PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.

This is an action by an employer under section 3852 of the Labor Code, to recover the amount of workmen’s compensation benefits paid to an employee who was injured in the course of employment by the alleged negligence of the defendants. The question squarely addressed by the appeal is whether the applicable period of limitations for commencement of the action is one year (Code Civ. Proc., § 340, subd. 3) or three years (id., § 338, subd. 1).

We have been compelled to conclude that we cannot reach the merits of the appeal, because the order appealed from— which purportedly terminated the action…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. American Can Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. White v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API