Legal Opinion
Utz v. Aureguy
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1952No. Civ. 14726PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal on the judgment roll from a judgment dismissing the action.
The record consists of the third amended complaint; notice of motion to amend the same, and the amendment; motion to dismiss; demurrer to third amended complaint and to the amendment thereto; points and authorities; order of substitution ; judgment; notice of appeal, and request for transcript.
The motion to dismiss the action was made on the grounds that “As originally begun with the filing of the complaint herein, the action was sham and based on false allegations” and the first, second and third amended…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Glogau v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Cunha v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Alkus v. Johnson-Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Rossiter v. BenoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- White v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Wint v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Guillory v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.