Legal Opinion

White Lighting Co. v. Wolfson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1968No. L. A. 29493PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Although it discusses other matters, this opinion sets forth three principal rulings: first, that the statute of frauds does not apply to an oral employment contract, even though it provides in part for the measurement of the employee’s compensation by annual receipts of the employer, unless its terms foreclose the employee’s completion of the performance of the contract within one year; second, that the statute of frauds does not apply to an oral contract in its entirety if the court by reference to the terms of the agreement can separate those promises of performance not falling within the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Lennerth v. MendenhallDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API