Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vallindras v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1954No. S. F. 18869PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*151THE COURT.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants after general demurrers to his amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend. The complaint attempts to state a cause of action for damages for false imprisonment against Sheriff Daniel C. Murphy and his surety. It alleges that the defendant sheriff “did unlawfully imprison plaintiff in the County Jail. ’ ’ It specifies that in April, 1950, the sheriff imprisoned plaintiff under an order of the superior court adjudging him guilty of contempt for wilful failure to pay attorney’s fees and support money to his wife in a pending…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robinette v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Raiden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City of Culver City v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In Re WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Collins v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Oppenheimer v. AshburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API