Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Modern Faucet Manufacturing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1955No. L. A. 23649PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

On August 3, 1951, plaintiff brought an action seeking damages for breach of an oral contract. He alleged in his third amended complaint “That on or about the 17th day of October 1950 the plaintiff and defendants entered into an oral agreement” whereby he was given the exclusive right to buy from defendants certain patented shower heads. He also alleged that “a written memorandum of said agreement, signed by the defendants, is set forth in a letter dated October 17, 1950, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit ‘A’ and made a part hereof as though set forth herein in full.” A demurrer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Keidatz v. AlbanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cunha v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. McKenna v. Elliott & Horne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Palomar Mobilehome Park Association v. City of San MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Pianka v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Sterling v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kanarek v. BugliosiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Lincoln v. DidakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API