Legal Opinion
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. Turnham
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 2, 1992No. C3-91-991PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
The petitioner, Nicollet Restoration, Inc., seeks review of a court of appeals decision which held that a corporation must be represented by a licensed attorney when appearing in district court notwithstanding that the action originated in conciliation court. We affirm.
This is a commercial landlord-tenant dispute. The petitioner, a corporation, commenced an action in conciliation court against respondent for unpaid rent and cleaning charges. Both petitioner and respondent appeared without counsel at the May 17, 1990, hearing. Judgment for the petitioner was entered in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Commercial & Railroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, Richards & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Sharood v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Cary Company v. F.E. Satterlee CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Old Hickory Engineering & MacHine Co. v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.