Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wetzel v. Schlenvogt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2005No. 20050121, 20050122PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Orville Paul Schlenvogt appeals from a South Central Judicial District Court grant of two disorderly conduct restraining orders against him, enjoining him from having any contact with Curt Wetzel and Cenex Oil of Glen Ullin, North Dakota. We affirm the Wetzel restraining order, holding that a disorderly conduct restraining order does not require a pattern of behavior. We vacate the Cenex order, holding that when a case is commenced on behalf of a corporation by a non-attorney agent, the case and all legal documents signed by the non-attorney agent are void from the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Carr Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Svedberg v. StamnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kautzman v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Department of Labor for the Benefit of Fair Housing of the Dakotas v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API