Legal Opinion
Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 2005No. A03-1794PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
This case concerns the legal validity of a complaint filed on behalf of a corporation but signed by a nonattorney. Respondent Save Our Creeks (SOC), a nonprofit corporation, filed a complaint against the City of Brooklyn Park (the City), seeking relief from the City’s denial of SOC’s petition for environmental review of certain proposed development projects. The complaint was signed by a nonattorney spokesperson for SOC. The district court permitted SOC to amend its complaint by adding an attorney’s signature and allowed the amendment to relate back to the date the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Becker v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edelman v. Lynchburg CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Old Hickory Engineering & MacHine Co. v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y ValoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Hawkeye Bank & Trust, National Ass'n v. BaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- H & H Development, LLC v. RamlowMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Kimberly McKeon, M.D., and Ashley Morrow, R.N.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.