Legal Opinion
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 1, 2010No. A09-1293PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
This litigation arises out of alleged misrepresentations in sales of new condominiums. The district court granted respondent purchasers relief. Appellants (the developer, a related entity that purchased unsold units, and the principal investor in and manager of both entities) claim the district court erred by (1) allowing appellant business entities to appear at trial without counsel; (2) violating appellants’ right to a jury trial; (3) finding appellant manager waived personal service; (4) finding appellant developer violated the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act (MCFA) by…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Holcomb Condominium Homeowners' Ass'n v. Stewart Venture, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- David R. Nicholson, Builder, LLC v. JablonskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Smith v. Rustic Home Builders, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- COPIC Insurance v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.