Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 17, 1976No. 46245PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Minneapolis Star and Tribune Company, Peter Ackerberg, and Leonard J. Canning, commenced this action to obtain a temporary and permanent injunction prohibiting defendant Housing and Redevelopment Authority (hereinafter HRA) and the individual defendants from conducting official meetings closed to the public. In addition, plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that all meetings of the HRA convened for the purpose of transacting public business be open to the public, and the imposition of civil penalties pursuant to Minn.St. 471.705, the Minnesota Open Meeting Law.

Th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. Times Publishing Company v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Illinois Education Ass'n v. Illinois State Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. DIST. ATT. FOR THE PLYMOUTH v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API