Legal Opinion
Sharood v. Hatfield
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 1973No. 44439PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an original proceeding commenced in this court challenging the constitutionality of portions of L. 1973, c. 638, in so far as they affect the right of this court to regulate the practice of law. Petitioners are R. Paul Sharood, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota and a member of the Minnesota State Bar Association; Robert M. Frisbee, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota who is not a member of the Minnesota State Bar Association; and the Minnesota State Bar Association, an unincorporated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- State v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- In re Court Room & Offices of the Fifth Branch of the Circuit Court, Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Denver Bar Association v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.