Cary Company v. F.E. Satterlee Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant in this suit brought an action in replevin in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis to recover certain machinery which it had sold to plaintiff under a conditional sale contract. Thereupon plaintiff brought this action in the district court to reform the conditional sale contract and enjoin defendant from prosecuting the action in replevin, and obtained a temporary restraining order. The court found that plaintiff had failed to establish a cause of action and denied any relief. Plaintiff appealed.
The complaint alleges the bringing of the action in replevin and contains…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Union Savings Ass'n v. Home Owners Aid, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- State Ex Inf. Miller v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.