Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. Insomniac, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2015No. B252838PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs and appellants Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission (Commission) and Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Association (Association) 1 appeal from a judgment and order of dismissal entered following the sustaining without leave to amend of demurrers by defendants and respondents Insomniac, Inc. (Insomniac), Pasquale Rotella (Rotella), Go Ventures, Inc. (Ventures), and Reza Gerami (Gerami). 2 According to plaintiffs, the judgment and order of dismissal should be reversed because each of the causes of action as to which the demurrers were sustained stated facts…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Global Eagle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze HsuDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. Reniger v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Stereoscope, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API