Legal Opinion
Bruton v. Gerber Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2017No. 15-15174PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*470ORDER
Defendant-Appellee Gerber Products Company’s Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED, in part. The memorandum disposition previously filed on April 19, 2017, and the partial dissent filed with it, are hereby withdrawn, and a new memorandum disposition shall be filed simultaneously.
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiff-Appellant Natalia Bruton filed a putative class action against baby food manufacturer Gerber Products Company (Gerber). Bruton alleged that labels on certain Gerber baby food products included claims about nutrient and sugar .content that were impermissible under Food and Drug Administration…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Leoni v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Williams v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- A.B., a minor, by and through his guardian JEN TURNER v. GOOGLE LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Abuelhawa v. Santa Clara UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.