Legal Opinion
Reniger v. Hyundai Motor America
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 18, 2015No. Case No. 14-3612 SCPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE ....
Samuel Conti, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court are two motions in this putative class action alleging consumer protection, fraud, and warranty claims related to alleged low-speed stalling of Hyundai Santa Fe vehicles. See ECF No. 21 (“SAC”). First, Defendants Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company (“HMC”) (collectively, “Hyundai”) hávé moved to strike Plaintiffs’ class action allegations and allegations relating to the Kia Motor Group on the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Satchell v. Sonic Notify, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Arroyo v. Pollock 1400 ECR Owner, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Chrysler Pacifica Fire Recall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Hamm v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.