Legal Opinion
Stereoscope, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2017No. 15-55370UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Appellants Stereoscope, LLC, Cronkite & Kissell, LLC, Clint Cronkite, and David Kissell (collectively, “Stereoscope”) appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint against Appellees U.S. Bank National Association, Kim Galbraith, and Olaeye Fadahunsi (collectively, “US Bank”) arising from US Bank’s handling of an escrow account. The district court dismissed Stereoscope’s claims without leave to amend. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 1
1. “We review de novo the district court’s decision to grant [a] motion to dismiss under Federal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ChowNow, Inc. v. Owner.comDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Mi A Lowe v. Mao Izakaya & Sushi LLC, and othersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026