Legal Opinion

Tatung Co. v. Shu Tze Hsu

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 14, 2016No. Case No.: SA CV 13-1743 (DOC) (ANx)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [749, 750, 763]; DENYING MOTIONS TO JOIN IN CO-DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS [757, 764, 769]; GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [762]

David O. Carter, United States District Judge

I. INTRO

Before the Court are the Bird Marella Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 749); the Former Employee Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 750); and Defendant David Chen’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 763). Also before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 762). The Court heard…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
  2. City of Almaty v. AblyazovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Peter Humphrey v. GlaxoSmithKline PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Global Master Intl Group, Inc. v. Esmond Natural, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. Synopsys, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API