Legal Opinion

Georgopolis v. George

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1952No. 35,725PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

In this suit plaintiffs appealed from a judgment entered after an order denying their motion for amended findings or for a new trial.

Defendant Peter George will hereinafter he referred to as defendant. His relative, Peter Georgantones, was joined as a defendant only because he holds a mortgage on the property involved in the suit. He will hereinafter be referred to as Georgantones. Plaintiffs, who are the sis brothers and sisters of defendant, will each be referred to by his first name.

Defendant holds legal title to a house and lot at 1621 Niles avenue, St. Paul.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Irvine v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Rail Road v. ParcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  5. Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. SodergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API