Uselman v. Uselman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
We accelerated review of judgments entered in favor of defendants Jerry L. Usel-man, George J. Uselman and Norwest Bank on the merits of the complaint and amended complaints of plaintiffs Mary Ann Uselman, et al. for the purpose of considering within the context of this appeal the propriety of the trial court’s imposition of sanctions and costs in the aggregate amount of $190,200 against plaintiffs’ counsel Carol O’Toole pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 549.21 and Minn.R.Civ.P. ll.1 We consolidated separate appeals of the plaintiffs and O’Toole and affirm the judgment…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Joyce Witzman v. Bert M. Gross Phillips & Gross, P.A., Formerly Known as Phillips, Gross & Aaron, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Powell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.