Legal Opinion

Irvine v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1913No. Nos. 18,073—(29)PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied city lots. The answer of defendant Campbell set out the written agreement referred to in the opinion, and prayed that it be adjudged a valid lien upon the premises and that the same be sold under the direction of the court and the proceeds distributed pursuant to the terms of the contract.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied city lots. The answer of defendant Campbell set out the written agreement referred to in the opinion, and prayed that it be adjudged a valid lien upon the premises and that the same be sold under the direction of the court and the proceeds distributed pursuant to the terms of the contract. The reply admitted an agreement between the.father of plaintiff and defendant Campbell and another, and alleged that the acknowledgement thereof was not made until long after the death of plaintiff’s ■father,…

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to certain lots located in an addition to the city of St. Paul. The defendant Campbell answered, asserting an interest in the lots under the contract hereinafter set forth. The action was presented to the court upon & stipulated statement of facts, which, so far as here important, may be summarized as follows:

In 1905, the then owner of the lots authorized the defendants, who were real estate agents, to sell them for the sum of $325. The lots were then worth $Y50, and were so situated that the defendants believed they would increase…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. King v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Floyd v. DuffyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Church v. OdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  4. San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API