Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1992No. C8-92-740PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
The state initiated this consumer fraud and antitrust action against appellant Alpine Air Products, Inc. (Alpine), a manufacturer of ozone-producing air purifiers, and its president, appellant William Converse. The trial court found Alpine engaged in false, deceptive and misleading claims about its products and violated Minnesota antitrust law by engaging in vertical price-fixing. Appellants challenge the judgment and the denial of their new trial motion. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 3, 1990, the State of Minnesota sued Alpine Air Products, Inc. and its president, William…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Boubelik v. Liberty State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- People v. ShifrinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.