Legal Opinion
Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 9, 1955No. 36,677PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The plaintiff commenced his action for damages against the defendant in the municipal court of Minneapolis, basing his claim on fraud and misrepresentation and alleging that defendant represented to him that he was selling him a 1951 Pontiac used automobile but delivered to him a 1950 used model. In about a week after the transaction was closed and the car paid for and delivered, plaintiff discovered that he had gotten a 1950 model and notified the defendant. No corrective action being taken, suit followed.
The transaction took place July 3, 1953, at defendant’s place of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Rockefeller v. MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Fisher v. MellenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Weise v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.