Legal Opinion

Friday v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1943No. L. A. 18710PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The Board of Governors of The State Bar recommends the suspension of petitioner from the practice of law for six months and that, before he may be permitted to resume practice, he be required to take and pass the examination given to attorneys from other states seeking admission to practice in this state.

The local administrative committee found that petitioner solicited employment in his professional capacity from Jean Mackenzie, who at the time was represented by another attorney.

Jean Mackenzie had a claim for $639 against the estate of Gil*503bert E. Gould, deceased, and possibly against one of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Petersen v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lowell Lyons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. In Re DawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API