Linnick v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner was charged by a local administrative committee with five counts of professional misconduct, three of which were subsequently dismissed. The other two counts charged that during the period from April 30, 1958, through December 1960, petitioner, pursuant to agreement, compensated Sam Williams and Donald Cooksey for soliciting professional employment for him. These counts charged violations of the provision of rule 3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct that “A member of the State Bar shall not . . . remunerate another for soliciting or obtaining, professional employment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. MalotteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Hildebrand v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Browne v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brawner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.