Legal Opinion

Mitton v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1969No. L. A. 29611PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law in this state for a period of three months for a violation of rule 12 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (communicating with opposing party in the absence of counsel with respect to the subject of controversy). Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1954.

Questions: First. Does the evidence sustain the finding of culpability on the part of petitioner ?

Yes. The burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Turner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mitton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Carpenter v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gerritsma v. VogelaarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Wilhelm v. Pray, Price, Williams & RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. United States of America, Robin L. Harris v. Virgilio TalaoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Chronometrics, Inc. v. Sysgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. TRIPLE a MACHINE SHOP, INC v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API