Legal Opinion
Vasiljevich v. Radanovich
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1934No. Civ. No. 8972PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant George Eadanovich and Ognjen Bukvich, deceased, were during the latter’s lifetime engaged in the purchase and sale of real property in Los Angeles County. Bukvich died on July 20, 1926. At that time the record title to portions of two lots stood in the names of the partners. A portion of one of the lots had been sold by them to one Sotere, and the balance of the purchase price was collected by and remained on deposit in a Los Angeles bank at the time of Bukvich’s death. Eadanovich claimed certain amounts alleged to have been advanced by him for taxes, assessments, material…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blankman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Harper v. LampingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Staples v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Ryer v. Fletcher Ryer Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Tavernier v. MaesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Los Angeles Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers & Bartenders v. Stan's Drive-Ins, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Strohm v. StrohmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.