Legal Opinion

Shunken v. Cohen

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1918No. L. A. No. 4496PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Veitch & Richardson, Harry Ellis Dean, and Isador Morris, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

H. Cohen, one of the defendants, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs on their bill in equity, and against said Cohen on his action, by way of cross-complaint, for recovery on six promissory notes for five hundred dollars each. The other defendant made default, so the action as to The Traders Bank of Los Angeles (a corporation) need not be considered herein.

The transcript consists of the judgment-roll alone. There is no bill of exceptions and it does not appear that any party demurred to any of the pleadings. Before judgment the plaintiffs were permitted to file certain amendments…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Harper v. LampingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Ross v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Rassaert v. MenschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Engelman v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API