Legal Opinion

Tavernier v. Maes

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1966No. Civ. 21941PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for the defendant entered on a jury verdict in an action in which he sought to recover damages occasioned by and attendant to a fractured ankle suffered when the defendant slid into him in the course of a family softball game.

He asserts that prejudicial error resulted when the trial court submitted the question of assumption of risk to the jury. More specifically he urges that the defendant produced no evidence to entitle him to the benefit of the doctrine of assumption of risk, that the instructions which were used were erroneous and erroneously given,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Brown v. San Francisco Ball Club, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bank of New York v. Fremont General Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Fuller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Reddell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Thomas v. Holliday by and Through HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API