Legal Opinion

Strohm v. Strohm

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1960No. Civ. 24136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendant husband from an interlocutory judgment of divorce granted to plaintiff. Defendant asserts the court erred: (1) in awarding support to plaintiff in that the evidence failed to show her needs and his ability to pay; (2) in finding certain corporate stock standing in his name to be community property and awarding half of it to plaintiff. He also claims the judgment is uncertain in one respect.

The parties were married on September 23, 1953. They purchased a home subject to an encumbrance in March 1954, taking title as joint tenants. A daughter was born on July 30,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Estate of WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Speer v. QuinlanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Somps v. SompsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. In Re Marriage of HillermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Millington v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API