Legal Opinion

Buttnick v. Clothier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1953No. 32102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs as owners and lessors of certain real property to recover unpaid rentals under a written lease. . Martha Remmen, the original lessee, and Ethel Clothier, the assignee of the lease, were joined as parties defendant. Defendants filed separate answers to the complaint. Defendant Remmen set forth certain affirmative defenses, cross-complained for relief ¿gainst plaintiffs, and prayed, in the event that judgment be entered against her, for judgment over against defendant Clothier for such sum as she might be required to pay. Defendant Clothier, by way of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pronger v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Eyers v. Burbank Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kaas v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. McInnis & Co. v. Western Tractor & Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Owen v. MatzWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. M. O. Anderson, A. B. C. Packard, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API