Weitzman v. Bergstrom
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The respondent E. Y. Bergstrom advertised in the newspaper that he had money to invest in a small business, and an agent of the appellant contacted him with an offer to sell him a vending machine “route” consisting of 1,000 machines which vended chewing gum balls, candy and trinkets, which were allegedly installed in supermarkets and other stores. These machines are familiar items and are known to be patronized by children.
The agent represented that the vending machines or dispensers had been installed for at least 5 months and that they yielded sufficient funds to afford a profit of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- London v. ToneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Bonded Adjustment Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Glenn Dick Equipment Co. v. Galey Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Norris v. NorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Schmitt v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Singer Credit Corp. v. Mercer Island Masonry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- United Forest Products Co. v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.