Eyers v. Burbank Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Franklin county, Linn, J., entered May 9, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover damages for fraudulent representations.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Respondent’s second amended complaint, as it stood after a motion had been passed upon to strike various allegations in his preceding amended complaint, alleged, in substance, as follows:(1) That, prior to January 1, 1915, the Burbank Company, a corporation of the state of Washington, employed representatives in the state of Wisconsin for the purpose of securing purchasers for lands situated in Walla Walla county, Washington.(2) That, for the purpose of inducing respondent to enter into a contract for the purchase of lands, appellant represented to respondent that it had in growing alfalfa…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Wilson v. New United States Cattle-Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Hedden v. GriffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Hunt County Oil Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Strand v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Smith v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Westby v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Champneys v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Westby v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.