Legal Opinion

Queener v. United Employers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1992No. 90-02240; CA A70779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed the denial of her aggravation and medical services claims. The Board held that her worsened back condition was not causally connected to her compensable injury. We affirm.

Claimant injured her back in May, 1985, while working as a convenience store clerk. By March, 1986, her condition had sufficiently resolved to permit her to return to modified work. A determination order closed her claim on June 5, 1987, and awarded her 15 percent unscheduled disability. A stipulated settlement in September, 1987, which was the last…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hoke v. Libby, McNeil & LibbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Taylor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API