Hoke v. Libby, McNeil & Libby
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding the denial of his aggravation claim. We modify the order to clarify the issues of attorney fees and penalties and otherwise affirm.
To establish an aggravation claim, a claimant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence a worsening, of his condition since the last award or arrangement of compensation and a causal relation between that worsening and his compensable injury. ORS 656.273(1); Brewer v. SAIF, 59 Or App 87, 89-90, 650 P2d 947 (1982). Claimant has not sustained his burden of proving that his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garbutt v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Jacobson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Brewer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kuhn v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Hoke v. Libby, Mcneil & LibbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Queener v. United Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Brown v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.