Metric Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. The sole issue presented is whether plaintiff’s demands upon the contracting officer for extended home office overhead costs in “an amount exceeding $91,000” and for third-party indemnification fees “exceeding $7,500” allegedly incurred during performance of a contract with the U.S. Army are sum-certain claims cognizable under the Contracts Disputes Act (CDA), which would allow plaintiff’s resort to judicial remedies pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 605(c)(5). For reason hereinafter stated, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Tecom, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Metric Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Z.A.N. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Modeer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hamza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Sun Eagle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.