Tecom, Inc. v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or Board) determined that appellant Tecom, Inc. (Tecom) implicitly suffered a change (under the Changes article of its contract with the Government) but is not entitled to an equitable adjustment because it failed to show that that change increased its contract costs. Appellant contends that the latter holding is wrong. The Government says that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, and, in any event, that the ASBCA must be upheld on the merits. We hold that we have jurisdiction and affirm.
I
In September 1980 the United…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- J.F. Shea Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
3Cited by91 opinions
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Placeway Construction Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Richard L. Thoen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.