Legal Opinion

Modeer v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 26, 2005No. 03-2783 CPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This contract dispute is currently before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion For Summary *134Judgment, filed March 2, 2005, and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Cross-Motion For Partial Summary Judgment, filed on April 4, 2005. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs’ motion is granted in part and denied in part, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part, and defendant’s alternative cross-motion for partial summary judgment is granted.

BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. Robert and Emily Modeer (plaintiffs…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Baha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API