Legal Opinion
Hamza v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-591CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted.
Facts
Plaintiff, Hussam T. Hamza, a citizen of Saudi Arabia, owns real property and buildings located in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, collectively known as the Hamza Compound. On October 8,1990, plaintiff leased the Ham-za Compound to the United States Government for an annual rental rate of $1,750,000. The Dhahran Area Office (DAO) of the United States Army Corps of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Medina Construction, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Scan-Tech Security, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- J & E Salvage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- GPA-I, LP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- McNabb v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.