Legal Opinion

Metric Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 8, 1983No. 647-81CPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In this “direct access” construction contract case, filed pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. Sec. 609(a)(1) (Supp. V 1981) (CDA), plaintiff seeks to recover a fee it paid, or.is required to pay, to a third party indemnitor of a surety company which, it is alleged, agreed to issue required performance and payment bonds on the strength of said indemnity agreement, in connection with plaintiff’s bid and subsequent award of a contract by the Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NFEC). Plaintiff’s position is that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Modeer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API