Legal Opinion
Z.A.N. Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 5, 1984No. 432-81CPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YANNELLO, Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. Defendant contends that the portions of the complaint which seek to contest the defendant’s default termination of the contract and assessment of excess repro-curement costs and which seek to assert a claim for a termination for the convenience of the government are untimely and must be dismissed.1 In response, plaintiff interposes, inter alia, the Fulford doctrine. For the reasons stated herein, the defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Certain portions of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Tecom, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Warchol Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- D. Moody & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Pathman Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.