Legal Opinion

Huntley v. Board of Trustees

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1913No. Sac. No. 2017PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an order of the hoard of trustees of the City of Auburn, sitting as a board of equalization, increasing an assessment of real property. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

A writ of review was sued out in the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, under which writ it was sought to have declared null and void an order of the trustees of the city of Auburn, a municipality of the sixth class, sitting as a board of equalization, increasing the assessment of real property of the petitioner over and above the valuation placed thereon by the assessor of the city. From the decision given by the court of appeals a hearing before this court was ordered.

Admittedly the order was made and the assessment of petitioner’s property was increased five hundred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Los Angeles v. Board of Equalization of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. La Grange Hydraulic Gold Mining Co. v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gladwin v. GladwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Savings & Loan Society v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. McClelland v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Birch v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. County of Los Angeles v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gaumer v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API