Legal Opinion

Gaumer v. County of Tehama

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1967No. Civ. 11297PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

The County of Tehama has appealed from a judgment allowing recovery of real property taxes paid under protest.

This ease concerns the question whether the failure of an assessor to inform an assessee of an increased assessment of over 25 percent on the assessee’s land precludes collection of a tax based on the increase in assessed value. The trial court answered that question affirmatively. We agree with that holding. A statute requiring that such notice be given is mandatory. All administrative remedies having been exhausted, the taxpayers properly brought this action. Our opinion deals in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sava v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Lick v. DahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Tamco Dev. Co. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API